Sudan vs Zambia: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value, per capita
Sudan
0 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Zambia
0 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Sudan rank
163rd
Zambia rank
160th
Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value, per capita over time
- Sudan
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 0 1000 USD per person against 0 1000 USD per person in Sudan, a difference of 0 1000 USD per person.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Sudan ranks 163rd and Zambia ranks 160th of 184 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0004 1000 USD per person | 0 1000 USD per person | 0.0003 1000 USD per person | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 1000 USD per person | 0 1000 USD per person | 0 1000 USD per person | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood, non-coniferous — import value, per capita, Sudan or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 0 1000 USD per person against 0 1000 USD per person in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawnwood, non-coniferous — import value, per capita between Sudan and Zambia?
- 0 1000 USD per person, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zambia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Sudan and Zambia rank globally for sawnwood, non-coniferous — import value, per capita?
- Sudan ranks 163rd and Zambia ranks 160th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.