New Zealand vs Thailand: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value, per square kilometre

New Zealand
0.1304 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand
0.1201 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
72nd
Thailand rank
75th

Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value, per square kilometre over time

  • New Zealand
  • Thailand
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.1304 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.1201 1000 USD per square kilometre in Thailand, a difference of 0.0103 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Thailand's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 72nd and Thailand ranks 75th of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0076 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.007 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 0.0114 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0294 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.018 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
1980s 0.0269 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1599 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.133 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
1990s 0.0336 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8434 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8098 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
2000s 0.0581 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5611 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.503 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
2010s 0.0991 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3867 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2876 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
2020s 0.1515 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1745 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.023 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sawnwood, non-coniferous — import value, per square kilometre, New Zealand or Thailand?
New Zealand, at 0.1304 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.1201 1000 USD per square kilometre in Thailand as of 2023.
What is the difference in sawnwood, non-coniferous — import value, per square kilometre between New Zealand and Thailand?
0.0103 1000 USD per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Thailand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Thailand rank globally for sawnwood, non-coniferous — import value, per square kilometre?
New Zealand ranks 72nd and Thailand ranks 75th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Thailand: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sawnwood-non-coniferous-import-value-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sawnwood-non-coniferous-import-value-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/thailand/">New Zealand vs Thailand: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,001 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.