Guam vs Suriname: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value, per unit of GDP
Guam
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Suriname
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Guam rank
171st
Suriname rank
171st
Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value, per unit of GDP over time
- Guam
- Suriname
How they compare
Guam currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Suriname, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Suriname ahead.
Guam ranks 171st and Suriname ranks 171st of 180 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guam averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Guam |
| 2020s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood, non-coniferous — import value, per unit of gdp, Guam or Suriname?
- Guam, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Suriname as of 2022.
- What is the difference in sawnwood, non-coniferous — import value, per unit of gdp between Guam and Suriname?
- 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Suriname?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2022.
- How do Guam and Suriname rank globally for sawnwood, non-coniferous — import value, per unit of gdp?
- Guam ranks 171st and Suriname ranks 171st of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Import value divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.