Egypt vs Tunisia: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Production, per capita
Egypt
0 m3 per person
in 2024
Tunisia
0 m3 per person
in 2024
Egypt rank
134th
Tunisia rank
136th
Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Production, per capita over time
- Egypt
- Tunisia
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 0 m3 per person against 0 m3 per person in Tunisia, a difference of 0 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Tunisia ahead.
Egypt ranks 134th and Tunisia ranks 136th of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 m3 per person | 0.0014 m3 per person | 0.0014 m3 per person | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 0 m3 per person | 0.0013 m3 per person | 0.0013 m3 per person | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 0 m3 per person | 0.0004 m3 per person | 0.0004 m3 per person | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | 0 m3 per person | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood, non-coniferous — production, per capita, Egypt or Tunisia?
- Egypt, at 0 m3 per person against 0 m3 per person in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawnwood, non-coniferous — production, per capita between Egypt and Tunisia?
- 0 m3 per person, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Tunisia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Tunisia rank globally for sawnwood, non-coniferous — production, per capita?
- Egypt ranks 134th and Tunisia ranks 136th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.