Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Production, per capita
Latvia
0.0004 m3 per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.0004 m3 per person
in 2024
Latvia rank
118th
Zimbabwe rank
120th
Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Production, per capita over time
- Latvia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0004 m3 per person against 0.0004 m3 per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 m3 per person.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 118th and Zimbabwe ranks 120th of 184 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1069 m3 per person | 0.0035 m3 per person | 0.1035 m3 per person | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.3187 m3 per person | 0.0023 m3 per person | 0.3164 m3 per person | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.321 m3 per person | 0.001 m3 per person | 0.32 m3 per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.3076 m3 per person | 0.0007 m3 per person | 0.3069 m3 per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood, non-coniferous — production, per capita, Latvia or Zimbabwe?
- Latvia, at 0.0004 m3 per person against 0.0004 m3 per person in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawnwood, non-coniferous — production, per capita between Latvia and Zimbabwe?
- 0 m3 per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zimbabwe?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Zimbabwe rank globally for sawnwood, non-coniferous — production, per capita?
- Latvia ranks 118th and Zimbabwe ranks 120th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.