Belarus vs Czechia: Sawnwood — Production, per capita
Belarus
0.5029 m3 per person
in 2024
Czechia
0.4339 m3 per person
in 2024
Belarus rank
11th
Czechia rank
14th
Sawnwood — Production, per capita over time
- Belarus
- Czechia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0.5029 m3 per person against 0.4339 m3 per person in Czechia, a difference of 0.069 m3 per person.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Belarus ranks 11th and Czechia ranks 14th of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Czechia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1695 m3 per person | 0.3253 m3 per person | 0.1557 m3 per person | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.2429 m3 per person | 0.4165 m3 per person | 0.1736 m3 per person | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.3324 m3 per person | 0.4097 m3 per person | 0.0773 m3 per person | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.4969 m3 per person | 0.4505 m3 per person | 0.0464 m3 per person | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood — production, per capita, Belarus or Czechia?
- Belarus, at 0.5029 m3 per person against 0.4339 m3 per person in Czechia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawnwood — production, per capita between Belarus and Czechia?
- 0.069 m3 per person, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Czechia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Czechia rank globally for sawnwood — production, per capita?
- Belarus ranks 11th and Czechia ranks 14th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.