Cuba vs Georgia: Sawnwood — Production, per capita
Cuba
0.0119 m3 per person
in 2024
Georgia
0.0139 m3 per person
in 2024
Cuba rank
77th
Georgia rank
75th
Sawnwood — Production, per capita over time
- Cuba
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0.0139 m3 per person against 0.0119 m3 per person in Cuba, a difference of 0.002 m3 per person.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.2 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 77th and Georgia ranks 75th of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0122 m3 per person | 0.0029 m3 per person | 0.0092 m3 per person | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0.0169 m3 per person | 0.0215 m3 per person | 0.0046 m3 per person | Georgia |
| 2010s | 0.0124 m3 per person | 0.02 m3 per person | 0.0077 m3 per person | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0.0118 m3 per person | 0.0156 m3 per person | 0.0039 m3 per person | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood — production, per capita, Cuba or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 0.0139 m3 per person against 0.0119 m3 per person in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawnwood — production, per capita between Cuba and Georgia?
- 0.002 m3 per person, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Georgia?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Georgia rank globally for sawnwood — production, per capita?
- Cuba ranks 77th and Georgia ranks 75th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.