Lithuania vs Slovenia: Sawnwood — Production, per capita
Lithuania
0.565 m3 per person
in 2024
Slovenia
0.5415 m3 per person
in 2024
Lithuania rank
8th
Slovenia rank
10th
Sawnwood — Production, per capita over time
- Lithuania
- Slovenia
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.565 m3 per person against 0.5415 m3 per person in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0235 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Lithuania ranks 8th and Slovenia ranks 10th of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 3 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2609 m3 per person | 0.2556 m3 per person | 0.0054 m3 per person | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0.3911 m3 per person | 0.2539 m3 per person | 0.1372 m3 per person | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.4337 m3 per person | 0.3602 m3 per person | 0.0735 m3 per person | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0.5085 m3 per person | 0.517 m3 per person | 0.0085 m3 per person | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood — production, per capita, Lithuania or Slovenia?
- Lithuania, at 0.565 m3 per person against 0.5415 m3 per person in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawnwood — production, per capita between Lithuania and Slovenia?
- 0.0235 m3 per person, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Slovenia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Slovenia rank globally for sawnwood — production, per capita?
- Lithuania ranks 8th and Slovenia ranks 10th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.