Egypt vs Iraq: Sawnwood — Production, per unit of GDP
Egypt
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Iraq
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Egypt rank
137th
Iraq rank
136th
Sawnwood — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Egypt
- Iraq
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Egypt, a difference of 0 m3 per US$ of GDP.
That makes Iraq's figure about 1.4 times Egypt's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Iraq ahead.
Egypt ranks 137th and Iraq ranks 136th of 179 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Iraq |
| 2000s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Iraq |
| 2010s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Iraq |
| 2020s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood — production, per unit of gdp, Egypt or Iraq?
- Iraq, at 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Egypt as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawnwood — production, per unit of gdp between Egypt and Iraq?
- 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Iraq?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Iraq rank globally for sawnwood — production, per unit of gdp?
- Egypt ranks 137th and Iraq ranks 136th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.