Eswatini vs Latvia: Sawnwood — Production, per unit of GDP
Eswatini
0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia
0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eswatini rank
1st
Latvia rank
2nd
Sawnwood — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Eswatini
- Latvia
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 m3 per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.
Eswatini ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 2nd of 179 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0004 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 m3 per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 m3 per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood — production, per unit of gdp, Eswatini or Latvia?
- Eswatini, at 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawnwood — production, per unit of gdp between Eswatini and Latvia?
- 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Latvia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Latvia rank globally for sawnwood — production, per unit of gdp?
- Eswatini ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 2nd of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.