Latvia vs World: Sawnwood — Production, per unit of GDP
Latvia
0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
World
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia rank
2nd
World rank
1st
Sawnwood — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Latvia
- World
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in World, a difference of 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP.
That makes Latvia's figure about 16.9 times World's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 2nd and World ranks 1st of 179 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | World | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0004 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0004 m3 per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.0003 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 m3 per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sawnwood — production, per unit of gdp, Latvia or World?
- Latvia, at 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in World as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sawnwood — production, per unit of gdp between Latvia and World?
- 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and World?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and World rank globally for sawnwood — production, per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 2nd and World ranks 1st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sawnwood — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sawnwood — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.