Angola vs Uruguay: Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Angola
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 1.06 kg/ha against 1.03 kg/ha in Angola, a difference of 0.03 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 102nd and Uruguay ranks 101st of 201 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.321 kg/ha | 0.8163 kg/ha | 0.4953 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 0.3488 kg/ha | 0.9733 kg/ha | 0.6244 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 0.3211 kg/ha | 0.9867 kg/ha | 0.6656 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 1990s | 0.3409 kg/ha | 0.9853 kg/ha | 0.6444 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0.5264 kg/ha | 1.64 kg/ha | 1.11 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0.922 kg/ha | 2.37 kg/ha | 1.45 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0.9596 kg/ha | 1.8 kg/ha | 0.8393 kg/ha | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Angola or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 1.06 kg/ha against 1.03 kg/ha in Angola as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Angola and Uruguay?
- 0.03 kg/ha, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Uruguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Uruguay rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Angola ranks 102nd and Uruguay ranks 101st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).