Barbados vs Russian Federation: Seed β Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Seed β Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Barbados
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 2.52 kg/ha against 2.52 kg/ha in Russian Federation, a difference of 0 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Barbados ranks 27th and Russian Federation ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.2 kg/ha | 2.53 kg/ha | 1.33 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 1.39 kg/ha | 2.2 kg/ha | 0.8105 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 2.14 kg/ha | 2.59 kg/ha | 0.4541 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 2.52 kg/ha | 2.51 kg/ha | 0.0176 kg/ha | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed β cropland nitrogen per unit area, Barbados or Russian Federation?
- Barbados, at 2.52 kg/ha against 2.52 kg/ha in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed β cropland nitrogen per unit area between Barbados and Russian Federation?
- 0 kg/ha, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Russian Federation rank globally for seed β cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Barbados ranks 27th and Russian Federation ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed β Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).