Burundi vs Hungary: Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Burundi
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 1.83 kg/ha against 1.77 kg/ha in Burundi, a difference of 0.06 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.
Burundi ranks 59th and Hungary ranks 57th of 201 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.9303 kg/ha | 2.32 kg/ha | 1.39 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 1970s | 0.8518 kg/ha | 2.36 kg/ha | 1.51 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 1980s | 0.853 kg/ha | 2.62 kg/ha | 1.77 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 1990s | 0.861 kg/ha | 2.22 kg/ha | 1.36 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 2000s | 0.6285 kg/ha | 1.6 kg/ha | 0.972 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 2010s | 0.7957 kg/ha | 2.03 kg/ha | 1.24 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 2020s | 1.8 kg/ha | 1.96 kg/ha | 0.1532 kg/ha | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Burundi or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 1.83 kg/ha against 1.77 kg/ha in Burundi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Burundi and Hungary?
- 0.06 kg/ha, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Hungary?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Hungary rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Burundi ranks 59th and Hungary ranks 57th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).