Central African Republic vs Czechia: Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Central African Republic
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 2.39 kg/ha against 0.2034 kg/ha in Central African Republic, a difference of 2.19 kg/ha.
That makes Czechia's figure about 11.8 times Central African Republic's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 32nd and Czechia ranks 32nd of 32 groups.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2451 kg/ha | 2.37 kg/ha | 2.12 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.2889 kg/ha | 2.75 kg/ha | 2.46 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.2742 kg/ha | 2.95 kg/ha | 2.67 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.2068 kg/ha | 2.54 kg/ha | 2.33 kg/ha | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Central African Republic or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 2.39 kg/ha against 0.2034 kg/ha in Central African Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Central African Republic and Czechia?
- 2.19 kg/ha, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Czechia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Central African Republic and Czechia rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Central African Republic ranks 32nd and Czechia ranks 32nd of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).