Chad vs Ethiopia PDR: Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Chad
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Chad currently reports 0.4666 kg/ha against 0.4439 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 0.0227 kg/ha.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia PDR's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 131st and Ethiopia PDR ranks 134th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 3 and Ethiopia PDR in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.6547 kg/ha | 0.5176 kg/ha | 0.1371 kg/ha | Chad |
| 1970s | 0.5928 kg/ha | 0.4266 kg/ha | 0.1662 kg/ha | Chad |
| 1980s | 0.396 kg/ha | 0.4527 kg/ha | 0.0567 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 0.5218 kg/ha | 0.4671 kg/ha | 0.0547 kg/ha | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Chad or Ethiopia PDR?
- Chad, at 0.4666 kg/ha against 0.4439 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Chad and Ethiopia PDR?
- 0.0227 kg/ha, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Chad and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Chad ranks 131st and Ethiopia PDR ranks 134th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).