Cuba vs Eritrea: Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Cuba
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0.2248 kg/ha against 0.2038 kg/ha in Cuba, a difference of 0.021 kg/ha.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 171st and Eritrea ranks 169th of 201 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2047 kg/ha | 0.3291 kg/ha | 0.1243 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0.1732 kg/ha | 0.2099 kg/ha | 0.0367 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0.2145 kg/ha | 0.2272 kg/ha | 0.0127 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 0.2038 kg/ha | 0.2239 kg/ha | 0.0201 kg/ha | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Cuba or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 0.2248 kg/ha against 0.2038 kg/ha in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Cuba and Eritrea?
- 0.021 kg/ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Eritrea rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Cuba ranks 171st and Eritrea ranks 169th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).