Ecuador vs Grenada: Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Ecuador
- Grenada
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0.3463 kg/ha against 0.3299 kg/ha in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0164 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 163rd and Grenada ranks 160th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Grenada in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4816 kg/ha | 0.1503 kg/ha | 0.3313 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 0.3896 kg/ha | 0.1519 kg/ha | 0.2377 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 0.4187 kg/ha | 0.1949 kg/ha | 0.2238 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 0.5437 kg/ha | 0.2281 kg/ha | 0.3156 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 0.6149 kg/ha | 0.246 kg/ha | 0.3689 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0.3599 kg/ha | 0.3828 kg/ha | 0.0229 kg/ha | Grenada |
| 2020s | 0.3289 kg/ha | 0.3396 kg/ha | 0.0107 kg/ha | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Ecuador or Grenada?
- Grenada, at 0.3463 kg/ha against 0.3299 kg/ha in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Ecuador and Grenada?
- 0.0164 kg/ha, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Grenada?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Grenada rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Ecuador ranks 163rd and Grenada ranks 160th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).