Eritrea vs French Polynesia: Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- French Polynesia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0.2248 kg/ha against 0.2242 kg/ha in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.0006 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was French Polynesia ahead.
Eritrea ranks 169th and French Polynesia ranks 170th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and French Polynesia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | French Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3291 kg/ha | 0.2827 kg/ha | 0.0464 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0.2099 kg/ha | 0.2742 kg/ha | 0.0643 kg/ha | French Polynesia |
| 2010s | 0.2272 kg/ha | 0.2478 kg/ha | 0.0206 kg/ha | French Polynesia |
| 2020s | 0.2239 kg/ha | 0.2264 kg/ha | 0.0025 kg/ha | French Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Eritrea or French Polynesia?
- Eritrea, at 0.2248 kg/ha against 0.2242 kg/ha in French Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Eritrea and French Polynesia?
- 0.0006 kg/ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and French Polynesia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and French Polynesia rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 169th and French Polynesia ranks 170th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).