Estonia vs Southern Africa: Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Estonia
- Southern Africa
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 2.43 kg/ha against 0.3306 kg/ha in Southern Africa, a difference of 2.1 kg/ha.
That makes Estonia's figure about 7.3 times Southern Africa's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 27th and Southern Africa ranks 34th of 185 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Southern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.96 kg/ha | 0.3039 kg/ha | 1.66 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2000s | 2.47 kg/ha | 0.2992 kg/ha | 2.17 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2010s | 2.33 kg/ha | 0.2962 kg/ha | 2.03 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2020s | 2.54 kg/ha | 0.3527 kg/ha | 2.19 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Estonia or Southern Africa?
- Estonia, at 2.43 kg/ha against 0.3306 kg/ha in Southern Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Estonia and Southern Africa?
- 2.1 kg/ha, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Southern Africa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Southern Africa rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Estonia ranks 27th and Southern Africa ranks 34th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).