Fiji vs Mauritania: Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Fiji
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 0.8189 kg/ha against 0.8048 kg/ha in Fiji, a difference of 0.0141 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Fiji ranks 121st and Mauritania ranks 118th of 201 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1755 kg/ha | 0.6372 kg/ha | 0.4617 kg/ha | Mauritania |
| 1970s | 0.1703 kg/ha | 0.6167 kg/ha | 0.4464 kg/ha | Mauritania |
| 1980s | 0.1358 kg/ha | 0.5498 kg/ha | 0.4139 kg/ha | Mauritania |
| 1990s | 0.0972 kg/ha | 0.4757 kg/ha | 0.3785 kg/ha | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 0.1873 kg/ha | 0.444 kg/ha | 0.2568 kg/ha | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 0.3818 kg/ha | 0.7053 kg/ha | 0.3234 kg/ha | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 0.6086 kg/ha | 0.8398 kg/ha | 0.2312 kg/ha | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Fiji or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 0.8189 kg/ha against 0.8048 kg/ha in Fiji as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Fiji and Mauritania?
- 0.0141 kg/ha, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Mauritania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Mauritania rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Fiji ranks 121st and Mauritania ranks 118th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).