French Polynesia vs Montenegro: Seed β Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Seed β Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- French Polynesia
- Montenegro
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 0.2242 kg/ha against 0.1907 kg/ha in Montenegro, a difference of 0.0335 kg/ha.
That makes French Polynesia's figure about 1.2 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 170th and Montenegro ranks 172nd of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2792 kg/ha | 0.3981 kg/ha | 0.1189 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 0.2478 kg/ha | 0.0555 kg/ha | 0.1924 kg/ha | French Polynesia |
| 2020s | 0.2264 kg/ha | 0.2848 kg/ha | 0.0585 kg/ha | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed β cropland nitrogen per unit area, French Polynesia or Montenegro?
- French Polynesia, at 0.2242 kg/ha against 0.1907 kg/ha in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed β cropland nitrogen per unit area between French Polynesia and Montenegro?
- 0.0335 kg/ha, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do French Polynesia and Montenegro rank globally for seed β cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- French Polynesia ranks 170th and Montenegro ranks 172nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed β Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).