Guatemala vs Qatar: Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Guatemala
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 0.8417 kg/ha against 0.8394 kg/ha in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0023 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Qatar ahead.
Guatemala ranks 115th and Qatar ranks 114th of 201 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.9828 kg/ha | 20.2 kg/ha | 19.22 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 1970s | 0.964 kg/ha | 13.8 kg/ha | 12.84 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 1980s | 0.919 kg/ha | 2.5 kg/ha | 1.58 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 1990s | 0.8163 kg/ha | 1.42 kg/ha | 0.6043 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 2000s | 0.7028 kg/ha | 1.27 kg/ha | 0.5673 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 2010s | 0.859 kg/ha | 0.9714 kg/ha | 0.1123 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 2020s | 0.8365 kg/ha | 1.05 kg/ha | 0.2156 kg/ha | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Guatemala or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 0.8417 kg/ha against 0.8394 kg/ha in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Guatemala and Qatar?
- 0.0023 kg/ha, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Qatar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Qatar rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Guatemala ranks 115th and Qatar ranks 114th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).