Kiribati vs Malta: Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Kiribati
- Malta
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Malta, a difference of 0 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.
Kiribati ranks 198th and Malta ranks 198th of 201 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 kg/ha | 0.6217 kg/ha | 0.6217 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1970s | 0.0103 kg/ha | 0.5951 kg/ha | 0.5848 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1980s | 0.1123 kg/ha | 0.505 kg/ha | 0.3927 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1990s | 0.1921 kg/ha | 0.444 kg/ha | 0.252 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2000s | 0.2767 kg/ha | 0.3435 kg/ha | 0.0669 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2010s | 0 kg/ha | 0.2388 kg/ha | 0.2388 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2020s | 0 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Kiribati or Malta?
- Kiribati, at 0 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Kiribati and Malta?
- 0 kg/ha, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Malta rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Kiribati ranks 198th and Malta ranks 198th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).