Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1 kg/ha
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
0.7972 kg/ha
in 2023
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
11th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
12th

Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time

  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
00.250.50.751196119922023

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 1 kg/ha against 0.7972 kg/ha in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 0.2028 kg/ha.

That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 1.3 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 11th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 12th of 18 groups.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries (LDCs) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9567 kg/ha 0.6513 kg/ha 0.3055 kg/ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1970s 0.9573 kg/ha 0.6211 kg/ha 0.3362 kg/ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1980s 0.9435 kg/ha 0.5814 kg/ha 0.3621 kg/ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1990s 0.9576 kg/ha 0.5917 kg/ha 0.3659 kg/ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2000s 1.01 kg/ha 0.6741 kg/ha 0.3384 kg/ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2010s 0.9694 kg/ha 0.8612 kg/ha 0.1082 kg/ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 1 kg/ha 0.8069 kg/ha 0.1979 kg/ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or United Republic of Tanzania?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 1 kg/ha against 0.7972 kg/ha in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.2028 kg/ha, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 11th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 12th of 18 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/seed-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/least-developed-countries-ldcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/seed-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/least-developed-countries-ldcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).