Malta vs Puerto Rico: Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Malta
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 0.0083 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Malta, a difference of 0.0083 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 198th and Puerto Rico ranks 195th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 6 and Puerto Rico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.6217 kg/ha | 0.0753 kg/ha | 0.5464 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1970s | 0.5951 kg/ha | 0.0748 kg/ha | 0.5203 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1980s | 0.505 kg/ha | 0.0852 kg/ha | 0.4197 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1990s | 0.444 kg/ha | 0.0405 kg/ha | 0.4036 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2000s | 0.3435 kg/ha | 0.0161 kg/ha | 0.3275 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2010s | 0.2388 kg/ha | 0.0136 kg/ha | 0.2252 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2020s | 0 kg/ha | 0.0089 kg/ha | 0.0089 kg/ha | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Malta or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 0.0083 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Malta and Puerto Rico?
- 0.0083 kg/ha, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Puerto Rico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malta and Puerto Rico rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Malta ranks 198th and Puerto Rico ranks 195th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).