Mauritius vs Spain: Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Mauritius
- Spain
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 1.09 kg/ha against 1.09 kg/ha in Spain, a difference of 0 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Spain ahead.
Mauritius ranks 98th and Spain ranks 99th of 201 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.035 kg/ha | 1 kg/ha | 0.9665 kg/ha | Spain |
| 1970s | 0.0464 kg/ha | 1.15 kg/ha | 1.11 kg/ha | Spain |
| 1980s | 0.1703 kg/ha | 1.21 kg/ha | 1.04 kg/ha | Spain |
| 1990s | 0.2663 kg/ha | 1.3 kg/ha | 1.03 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2000s | 0.5747 kg/ha | 1.68 kg/ha | 1.11 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2010s | 1.02 kg/ha | 1.72 kg/ha | 0.7024 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2020s | 1.16 kg/ha | 1.39 kg/ha | 0.2378 kg/ha | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Mauritius or Spain?
- Mauritius, at 1.09 kg/ha against 1.09 kg/ha in Spain as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Mauritius and Spain?
- 0 kg/ha, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Spain?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and Spain rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Mauritius ranks 98th and Spain ranks 99th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).