Poland vs Suriname: Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Poland
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 2.83 kg/ha against 2.8 kg/ha in Poland, a difference of 0.03 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.
Poland ranks 21st and Suriname ranks 20th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 5 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.35 kg/ha | 3.43 kg/ha | 0.0883 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 1970s | 3.31 kg/ha | 3.39 kg/ha | 0.0802 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 1980s | 3.53 kg/ha | 2.99 kg/ha | 0.533 kg/ha | Poland |
| 1990s | 3.39 kg/ha | 2.26 kg/ha | 1.13 kg/ha | Poland |
| 2000s | 3.24 kg/ha | 2.42 kg/ha | 0.825 kg/ha | Poland |
| 2010s | 3.3 kg/ha | 2.4 kg/ha | 0.903 kg/ha | Poland |
| 2020s | 2.93 kg/ha | 2.78 kg/ha | 0.1467 kg/ha | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Poland or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 2.83 kg/ha against 2.8 kg/ha in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Poland and Suriname?
- 0.03 kg/ha, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Poland and Suriname rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Poland ranks 21st and Suriname ranks 20th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).