Sri Lanka vs Zambia: Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Sri Lanka
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 0.894 kg/ha against 0.8638 kg/ha in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0302 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 113th and Zambia ranks 110th of 201 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.22 kg/ha | 0.6091 kg/ha | 0.6074 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 1.2 kg/ha | 0.6074 kg/ha | 0.5935 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 1.27 kg/ha | 0.6099 kg/ha | 0.6617 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 1.24 kg/ha | 0.6418 kg/ha | 0.6003 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 1.23 kg/ha | 0.7076 kg/ha | 0.5272 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 1.04 kg/ha | 0.7147 kg/ha | 0.3217 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0.9423 kg/ha | 0.813 kg/ha | 0.1293 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Sri Lanka or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 0.894 kg/ha against 0.8638 kg/ha in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Sri Lanka and Zambia?
- 0.0302 kg/ha, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Zambia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Sri Lanka and Zambia rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Sri Lanka ranks 113th and Zambia ranks 110th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).