Sweden vs Switzerland: Seed β Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Seed β Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Sweden
- Switzerland
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 1.59 kg/ha against 1.58 kg/ha in Switzerland, a difference of 0.01 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Switzerland ahead.
Sweden ranks 70th and Switzerland ranks 71st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 4 and Switzerland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.12 kg/ha | 2.57 kg/ha | 0.4479 kg/ha | Switzerland |
| 1970s | 2.33 kg/ha | 2.2 kg/ha | 0.133 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 1980s | 2.32 kg/ha | 2.06 kg/ha | 0.2538 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 1990s | 1.9 kg/ha | 1.94 kg/ha | 0.0337 kg/ha | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 1.83 kg/ha | 1.71 kg/ha | 0.1155 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 2010s | 1.72 kg/ha | 1.65 kg/ha | 0.076 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 2020s | 1.6 kg/ha | 1.66 kg/ha | 0.0534 kg/ha | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed β cropland nitrogen per unit area, Sweden or Switzerland?
- Sweden, at 1.59 kg/ha against 1.58 kg/ha in Switzerland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed β cropland nitrogen per unit area between Sweden and Switzerland?
- 0.01 kg/ha, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Switzerland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Sweden and Switzerland rank globally for seed β cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Sweden ranks 70th and Switzerland ranks 71st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed β Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).