Tonga vs Tunisia: Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Tonga
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 0.1774 kg/ha against 0.1698 kg/ha in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0076 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.
Tonga ranks 176th and Tunisia ranks 177th of 201 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tonga | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2631 kg/ha | 0.5358 kg/ha | 0.2727 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 1970s | 0.2544 kg/ha | 0.5614 kg/ha | 0.307 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 1980s | 0.163 kg/ha | 0.5505 kg/ha | 0.3875 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 0.1187 kg/ha | 0.5485 kg/ha | 0.4298 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 0.2481 kg/ha | 0.484 kg/ha | 0.2359 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 0.2605 kg/ha | 0.4643 kg/ha | 0.2038 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0.1717 kg/ha | 0.2542 kg/ha | 0.0824 kg/ha | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Tonga or Tunisia?
- Tonga, at 0.1774 kg/ha against 0.1698 kg/ha in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Tonga and Tunisia?
- 0.0076 kg/ha, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tonga and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Tonga and Tunisia rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Tonga ranks 176th and Tunisia ranks 177th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).