Afghanistan vs Lithuania: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Afghanistan
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 7,888 t against 7,521 t in Afghanistan, a difference of 367 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 43rd and Lithuania ranks 40th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,638 t | 8,175 t | 3,537 t | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 6,025 t | 6,254 t | 228.29 t | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 8,267 t | 7,153 t | 1,114 t | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 7,993 t | 7,299 t | 693.69 t | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Afghanistan or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 7,888 t against 7,521 t in Afghanistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Afghanistan and Lithuania?
- 367 t, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Lithuania rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Afghanistan ranks 43rd and Lithuania ranks 40th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).