Albania vs Costa Rica: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Albania
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Albania currently reports 547.8 t against 514.46 t in Costa Rica, a difference of 33.34 t.
That makes Albania's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Albania ahead.
Albania ranks 120th and Costa Rica ranks 122nd of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 6 and Costa Rica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,584 t | 375.15 t | 1,209 t | Albania |
| 1970s | 1,938 t | 444.49 t | 1,494 t | Albania |
| 1980s | 2,121 t | 454.87 t | 1,666 t | Albania |
| 1990s | 1,253 t | 441.44 t | 811.5 t | Albania |
| 2000s | 773.92 t | 457.88 t | 316.04 t | Albania |
| 2010s | 650.84 t | 442.71 t | 208.12 t | Albania |
| 2020s | 539.21 t | 598.78 t | 59.57 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Albania or Costa Rica?
- Albania, at 547.8 t against 514.46 t in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Albania and Costa Rica?
- 33.34 t, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Costa Rica?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Albania and Costa Rica rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Albania ranks 120th and Costa Rica ranks 122nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).