Algeria vs Serbia: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Algeria
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 4,977 t against 4,486 t in Algeria, a difference of 491 t.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Algeria's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Algeria ahead.
Algeria ranks 61st and Serbia ranks 58th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,527 t | 3,501 t | 2,026 t | Algeria |
| 2010s | 5,326 t | 4,621 t | 705.04 t | Algeria |
| 2020s | 4,518 t | 4,710 t | 192.52 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Algeria or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 4,977 t against 4,486 t in Algeria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Algeria and Serbia?
- 491 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Algeria and Serbia rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Algeria ranks 61st and Serbia ranks 58th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).