Argentina vs Türkiye: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Argentina
- Türkiye
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 60,652 t against 45,776 t in Türkiye, a difference of 14,876 t.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.3 times Türkiye's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Türkiye ahead.
Argentina ranks 10th and Türkiye ranks 13th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Türkiye in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 26,803 t | 48,398 t | 21,595 t | Türkiye |
| 1970s | 27,707 t | 54,475 t | 26,768 t | Türkiye |
| 1980s | 32,882 t | 56,709 t | 23,827 t | Türkiye |
| 1990s | 42,732 t | 61,453 t | 18,720 t | Türkiye |
| 2000s | 67,010 t | 54,455 t | 12,556 t | Argentina |
| 2010s | 96,599 t | 47,464 t | 49,136 t | Argentina |
| 2020s | 85,210 t | 44,307 t | 40,903 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Argentina or Türkiye?
- Argentina, at 60,652 t against 45,776 t in Türkiye as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Argentina and Türkiye?
- 14,876 t, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Türkiye?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Türkiye rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Argentina ranks 10th and Türkiye ranks 13th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).