Armenia vs Honduras: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Armenia
- Honduras
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 935.8 t against 856.81 t in Armenia, a difference of 78.99 t.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 119th and Honduras ranks 118th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 3 and Honduras in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,132 t | 777.63 t | 353.91 t | Armenia |
| 2000s | 1,202 t | 1,083 t | 119.35 t | Armenia |
| 2010s | 1,106 t | 943.06 t | 163.3 t | Armenia |
| 2020s | 827.66 t | 926.76 t | 99.1 t | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Armenia or Honduras?
- Honduras, at 935.8 t against 856.81 t in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Armenia and Honduras?
- 78.99 t, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Honduras?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Honduras rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Armenia ranks 119th and Honduras ranks 118th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).