Armenia vs Tunisia: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Armenia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 856.81 t against 840.78 t in Tunisia, a difference of 16.03 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tunisia ahead.
Armenia ranks 108th and Tunisia ranks 109th of 186 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,132 t | 2,672 t | 1,540 t | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 1,202 t | 2,392 t | 1,190 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 1,106 t | 2,336 t | 1,230 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 827.66 t | 1,258 t | 430.57 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Armenia or Tunisia?
- Armenia, at 856.81 t against 840.78 t in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Armenia and Tunisia?
- 16.03 t, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Tunisia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Tunisia rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Armenia ranks 108th and Tunisia ranks 109th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).