Austria vs Tajikistan: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Austria
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Austria currently reports 2,651 t against 2,333 t in Tajikistan, a difference of 318 t.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Tajikistan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 79th and Tajikistan ranks 82nd of 186 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,962 t | 1,332 t | 1,630 t | Austria |
| 2000s | 2,771 t | 1,456 t | 1,315 t | Austria |
| 2010s | 2,743 t | 1,895 t | 847.56 t | Austria |
| 2020s | 2,734 t | 2,442 t | 291.75 t | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Austria or Tajikistan?
- Austria, at 2,651 t against 2,333 t in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Austria and Tajikistan?
- 318 t, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Tajikistan rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Austria ranks 79th and Tajikistan ranks 82nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).