Barbados vs Iceland: Seed — Cropland nitrogen

Barbados
20.2 t
in 2023
Iceland
20.2 t
in 2023
Barbados rank
169th
Iceland rank
169th

Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Barbados
  • Iceland
020406080100196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 20.2 t against 20.2 t in Iceland, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Barbados ranks 169th and Iceland ranks 169th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 4 and Iceland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 2.13 t 2.13 t Iceland
1970s 0 t 35.66 t 35.66 t Iceland
1980s 6.06 t 2.73 t 3.32 t Barbados
1990s 20.2 t 3.01 t 17.19 t Barbados
2000s 20.2 t 2.73 t 17.46 t Barbados
2010s 20.2 t 10.37 t 9.83 t Barbados
2020s 20.2 t 20.2 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Barbados or Iceland?
Barbados, at 20.2 t against 20.2 t in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Barbados and Iceland?
0 t, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Iceland rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
Barbados ranks 169th and Iceland ranks 169th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).