Barbados vs Papua New Guinea: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Barbados
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 26.07 t against 20.2 t in Barbados, a difference of 5.87 t.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Barbados ranks 169th and Papua New Guinea ranks 166th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and Papua New Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 1970s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 1980s | 6.06 t | 0 t | 6.06 t | Barbados |
| 1990s | 20.2 t | 0 t | 20.2 t | Barbados |
| 2000s | 20.2 t | 0 t | 20.2 t | Barbados |
| 2010s | 20.2 t | 20.85 t | 0.6534 t | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 20.2 t | 26.07 t | 5.87 t | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Barbados or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 26.07 t against 20.2 t in Barbados as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Barbados and Papua New Guinea?
- 5.87 t, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Papua New Guinea?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Papua New Guinea rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Barbados ranks 169th and Papua New Guinea ranks 166th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).