Belarus vs Egypt: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belarus
- Egypt
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 14,479 t against 13,573 t in Egypt, a difference of 906 t.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 30th and Egypt ranks 33rd of 201 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 25,246 t | 11,428 t | 13,818 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 20,125 t | 11,053 t | 9,072 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 18,229 t | 12,964 t | 5,265 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 15,419 t | 15,417 t | 1.55 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Belarus or Egypt?
- Belarus, at 14,479 t against 13,573 t in Egypt as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Belarus and Egypt?
- 906 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Egypt?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Egypt rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Belarus ranks 30th and Egypt ranks 33rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).