Belize vs Luxembourg: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belize
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 78.9 t against 58.91 t in Belize, a difference of 19.99 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.3 times Belize's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Belize ranks 160th and Luxembourg ranks 158th of 201 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.65 t | 70.8 t | 50.16 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 63.39 t | 106.1 t | 42.7 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 49.67 t | 78.9 t | 29.23 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Belize or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 78.9 t against 58.91 t in Belize as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Belize and Luxembourg?
- 19.99 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Luxembourg rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Belize ranks 160th and Luxembourg ranks 158th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).