Bhutan vs Dominica: Seed — Cropland nitrogen

Bhutan
20.64 t
in 2023
Dominica
20.5 t
in 2023
Bhutan rank
167th
Dominica rank
168th

Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Bhutan
  • Dominica
10203040196119922023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 20.64 t against 20.5 t in Dominica, a difference of 0.14 t.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 167th and Dominica ranks 168th of 201 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Dominica Difference Ahead
1960s 35.72 t 8.73 t 26.99 t Bhutan
1970s 35.72 t 8.73 t 26.99 t Bhutan
1980s 35.72 t 9.6 t 26.12 t Bhutan
1990s 35.72 t 9.11 t 26.61 t Bhutan
2000s 35.72 t 14.42 t 21.3 t Bhutan
2010s 35.72 t 20.5 t 15.22 t Bhutan
2020s 21.33 t 20.5 t 0.8291 t Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Bhutan or Dominica?
Bhutan, at 20.64 t against 20.5 t in Dominica as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Bhutan and Dominica?
0.14 t, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Dominica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Dominica rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
Bhutan ranks 167th and Dominica ranks 168th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).