Burundi vs Slovakia: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Burundi
- Slovakia
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 2,953 t against 2,937 t in Slovakia, a difference of 16 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.
Burundi ranks 83rd and Slovakia ranks 84th of 201 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,059 t | 3,088 t | 2,029 t | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 844.44 t | 3,581 t | 2,737 t | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 1,168 t | 3,255 t | 2,087 t | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 2,946 t | 3,243 t | 297.55 t | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Burundi or Slovakia?
- Burundi, at 2,953 t against 2,937 t in Slovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Burundi and Slovakia?
- 16 t, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Slovakia rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Burundi ranks 83rd and Slovakia ranks 84th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).