Central America vs Italy: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Central America
- Italy
How they compare
Italy currently reports 18,934 t against 18,029 t in Central America, a difference of 905 t.
That makes Italy's figure about 1.1 times Central America's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Italy ahead.
Central America ranks 28th and Italy ranks 26th of 32 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Central America averaged higher in 3 and Italy in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central America | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16,234 t | 26,765 t | 10,531 t | Italy |
| 1970s | 16,633 t | 20,911 t | 4,278 t | Italy |
| 1980s | 19,259 t | 20,712 t | 1,454 t | Italy |
| 1990s | 19,016 t | 19,352 t | 336.27 t | Italy |
| 2000s | 19,511 t | 18,139 t | 1,372 t | Central America |
| 2010s | 19,842 t | 14,731 t | 5,111 t | Central America |
| 2020s | 19,379 t | 18,163 t | 1,216 t | Central America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Central America or Italy?
- Italy, at 18,934 t against 18,029 t in Central America as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Central America and Italy?
- 905 t, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and Italy?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Central America and Italy rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Central America ranks 28th and Italy ranks 26th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).