Chad vs Uruguay: Seed — Cropland nitrogen

Chad
2,490 t
in 2023
Uruguay
2,367 t
in 2023
Chad rank
91st
Uruguay rank
92nd

Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Chad
  • Uruguay
2.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Chad currently reports 2,490 t against 2,367 t in Uruguay, a difference of 123 t.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 91st and Uruguay ranks 92nd of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 4 and Uruguay in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 1,898 t 1,844 t 54.71 t Chad
1970s 1,774 t 1,619 t 155.9 t Chad
1980s 1,260 t 1,356 t 96.14 t Uruguay
1990s 2,202 t 1,324 t 877.59 t Chad
2000s 2,806 t 2,610 t 195.77 t Chad
2010s 2,490 t 5,395 t 2,905 t Uruguay
2020s 2,490 t 3,805 t 1,315 t Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Chad or Uruguay?
Chad, at 2,490 t against 2,367 t in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Chad and Uruguay?
123 t, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Uruguay rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
Chad ranks 91st and Uruguay ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).