Chile vs Dominican Republic: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Chile
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Chile currently reports 1,390 t against 1,319 t in Dominican Republic, a difference of 71 t.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 108th and Dominican Republic ranks 111th of 201 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,755 t | 428.43 t | 3,327 t | Chile |
| 1970s | 3,625 t | 493.36 t | 3,132 t | Chile |
| 1980s | 3,146 t | 569.55 t | 2,576 t | Chile |
| 1990s | 2,537 t | 577.8 t | 1,959 t | Chile |
| 2000s | 2,270 t | 787.87 t | 1,483 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 1,954 t | 854.56 t | 1,100 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 1,504 t | 1,194 t | 309.68 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Chile or Dominican Republic?
- Chile, at 1,390 t against 1,319 t in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Chile and Dominican Republic?
- 71 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Dominican Republic?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Dominican Republic rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Chile ranks 108th and Dominican Republic ranks 111th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).