Chile vs Sudan (former): Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Chile
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Chile currently reports 1,390 t against 1,372 t in Sudan (former), a difference of 18 t.
Across all 51 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 108th and Sudan (former) ranks 109th of 201 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,755 t | 492.68 t | 3,262 t | Chile |
| 1970s | 3,625 t | 721.88 t | 2,903 t | Chile |
| 1980s | 3,146 t | 663.29 t | 2,483 t | Chile |
| 1990s | 2,537 t | 1,104 t | 1,433 t | Chile |
| 2000s | 2,270 t | 1,405 t | 865.47 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 1,792 t | 1,340 t | 452.76 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Chile or Sudan (former)?
- Chile, at 1,390 t against 1,372 t in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Chile and Sudan (former)?
- 18 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sudan (former)?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Chile and Sudan (former) rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Chile ranks 108th and Sudan (former) ranks 109th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).