China, Hong Kong SAR vs Guadeloupe: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Guadeloupe
How they compare
Guadeloupe currently reports 0.0805 t against 0 t in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.0805 t.
Across all 46 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 183rd and Guadeloupe ranks 180th of 186 countries.
China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Guadeloupe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 41.98 t | 0.3506 t | 41.63 t | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 1970s | 66.26 t | 0.7843 t | 65.48 t | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 1980s | 71.29 t | 0.5405 t | 70.75 t | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 1990s | 39.19 t | 0.2806 t | 38.91 t | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2000s | 28 t | 0.1315 t | 27.87 t | China, Hong Kong SAR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, China, Hong Kong SAR or Guadeloupe?
- Guadeloupe, at 0.0805 t against 0 t in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2006.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between China, Hong Kong SAR and Guadeloupe?
- 0.0805 t, with Guadeloupe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Guadeloupe?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2006.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Guadeloupe rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 183rd and Guadeloupe ranks 180th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).