Colombia vs Ethiopia: Seed — Cropland nitrogen
Seed — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Colombia
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 12,424 t against 12,272 t in Colombia, a difference of 152 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 38th and Ethiopia ranks 35th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 2 and Ethiopia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,739 t | 6,670 t | 1,069 t | Colombia |
| 2000s | 8,639 t | 8,737 t | 97.28 t | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 11,898 t | 10,399 t | 1,500 t | Colombia |
| 2020s | 11,603 t | 12,145 t | 541.5 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland nitrogen, Colombia or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 12,424 t against 12,272 t in Colombia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland nitrogen between Colombia and Ethiopia?
- 152 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Ethiopia rank globally for seed — cropland nitrogen?
- Colombia ranks 38th and Ethiopia ranks 35th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).